This was the description of the Facebook group "Music Can't Die, but People Sure Can Try To Kill It." I've been trying for years to translate those thoughts onto paper, like this guy did. Enjoy.
Music is everywhere.
It's in our schools, it's in our car, it's on our computer, it's on our TV, it's in our moives, it's at our church.
Music at it's core is an art form.
Art is the expresion or display of emotion, ability, a story or an idea to create or release emotions for one's self or others.
There are many different forms of art.
Spoken Word, Pictures, sculptures, Music, Acting, film, dance, writing.
The list goes on and on.
Music, as an art form, is made to do four things.
Not always all four, but always at least one in order for it to be art.
1)To express emotion
2)to create emotions in others
3)to tell a story
4)to display ability.
If someone makes music without one of those four intentions it can't be considered art, and, in turn, it can't even be considered music.
When music, or any art form for that matter, is created with the sole intention of making money, it can no longer be considered art, which means it can't be
considered, by definiton, music.
"Music" like the Jonas Brothers, Soulja Boy Tell 'em, Lil Wayne, in fact a lot of rap today(Not all of it. Just quite a bit of the main stream radio played rap. I love rap. I'd say the rap I listen to is really good, and I listen to a lot of it. Just thought I'd clarify.), Miley Cyrus / Hannah Montana, Britney Spears, *NSYNC, Backstreet Boys, Camp Rock, High School Musical, the Pussy Cat Dolls, Avril Lavigne, Mariah Carey. Jesse McCartney, Spice Girls, Ricky Martin, Vanessa Hudgens, The Cheetah Girls (Notice how much of the things I'm listing are Disney)
Now don't get me wrong. I'm not saying as soon as an album makes money it's not music anymore, or that an artist can't want to make money. what I'm saying is that when the only reason you put out a record or a single is to make money you've stripped it of being art, which means it's no longer music.
If you're a fan of any of the "artists" I mentioned, I'm sorry if I've offended you, but that's how I feel. If what you like to listen to is all under the catogory of "I want my money" then I don't really think you can call yourself a true fan of music.
What really bothers me about these "artists" is this.
Here are a list of some of the best selling artists of all time.
The Beatles, Pink Floyd, The Rolling Stones, Queen, The Who, Bob Dylan, Bob Marley, Eminem, Nirvana, 2pac.
Do you think when the Beatles wrote "A Day in the Life" they were thinking about money?
When Pink Floyd wrote "Another Brick in the Wall Part 2" were they thinking about getting paid?
When the Rolling stones wrote "Gimme Shelter" Were they thinking about the money?
When Queen wrote "Bohemian Rhapsody", when The Who wrote "Baba O'Riley", when Bob Dylan wrote "Like a Rolling Stone", when Bob Marley wrote "I Shot the
Sheriff", When Eminem wrote "The Way I Am", When Nirvana wrote "Rape Me", when 2pac wrote "Only God Can Judge Me" were they thinking about the money?!?!
No. I really doubt it.
In 20 years These artists will still be on top, and if somebody asked me to name a Jonas Brother song I'd say "Jonas who?"
If all the first batch of "artists" I mentioned care about is making money, then they're just gonna keep releasing the same crap over and over again, and people are gonna keep buying it, but after a while people are just gonna forget about them. So I hope when they die richer than hell, but forgotten, that they're happy with that.
The point of this group is for people to express their opinions on music and the state it's in today, so go ahead and tell us what bands or artists you think are worth listening to rather than what the industry is trying to shove down our throats.